A- de 2016
The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.
Reporting justice Alberto Rojas Ríos
✓Claimant Javier Armando Suarez Pascagaza
Topics and subtopics of the ruling
✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.
- Rechazar por improcedente
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)
Recurso de reposición interpuesto en contra del Auto 182A/16 mediante el cual se rechazó por improcedente, la solicitud formulada por el representante legal de la Fundación Marido y Mujer, en el sentido de anular la totalidad del trámite de revisión correspondiente a los seis expedientes de tutela de la referencia.
Tras advertir que el nuevo incidente formulado es improcedente, la Sala Plena de la Corporación decide RECHAZARLO de plano.
What it decided
Operative part (Resuelve)
✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.
- Primero. RECHAZAR POR IMPROCEDENTE el recurso de reposición interpuesto contra el Auto 182A/16 mediante el cual se resolvió la solicitud de nulidad instaurada por JAVIER ARMANDO SUÁREZ PASCAGAZA, actuando en calidad de Representante Legal de la Fundación Marido y Mujer.
- Segundo. Contra esta decisión no procede recurso alguno.
The bench that decided
We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.
How it connects
Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.
The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.